Please check back with us for the latest news, announcements, and updates at Park Allergy Center!
On Wednesday October 8, 2025, my news feed contained an article about how the latest New England Journal of Medicine study found COVID shots to be effective in veterans. I obtained this study and analyzed it. As I suspected, this study had the same flaws found in most other such studies. The duration of this study was only 6 months. As I have already commented on previous posts, the study from Qatar by Chemaitelly et al. demonstrated that the mild improvement in COVID shot effectiveness (46.6% in their study) that occurs early on plummets in a linear fashion, turning NEGATIVE 5-6 months after shot administration. By 7-8 months, the effectiveness was -17.8.
Had the Chemaitelly study been extended, who knows how low it would have gone. So you see, by only looking at the first 6 months, you are getting a false impression of the shot’s performance. It’s dishonest and misleading.
Poor duration and timing selection can also be used the other way, making something look worse than it really is. For example, let’s take anti-virals. Anti-viral treatments work best when administered early on because that is when viruses replicate the most. Each day the treatment is delayed, it becomes less effective. Most are not recommended after 5-7 days of symptoms. So what if a group of scientists tried to study the effectiveness of potential anti-viral COVID treatments but only in hospitalized patients that have been sick for over 7-10 days…? Does that make any sense to you? No. Of course it does not. But that is exactly what happened early on during COVID.
Another problem I found in the NEJM study was ALL participants had to have received a COVID shot in the 2023-2024 season. Why is this a problem? As I have commented in previous posts, the more COVID shots one receives, the worse off they are. The Cleveland Clinic study clearly shows that each additional shot increases risk of COVID infection.
If participants with few or zero COVID shots were allowed into this study, they would have performed the best, revealing that the COVID shot group actually had an increased risk of infection compared to the control. By requiring all participants to have a COVID shot the year before, they diminished that potential problem.
Hong Hin Kim, Min-Ho Kim, Myeong Geun Choi, Eun Mi Chun, September 2025
This large-scale population based study was done in Seoul, South Korea with data from 2021 through 2023 involving 8.4 million people.
Overall risk of cancer was 27% higher in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.33).
Lung cancer risk increased by 53% (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.87).
Prostate cancer risk increased by 69% (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.35-2.11).
Thyroid cancer risk increased by 35% (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.21-1.52).
Stomach cancer risk increased by 34% (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.58).
Colorectal cancer risk increased by 28% (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12-1.47).
Breast cancer risk increased by 20% (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.34).
Vaccine Platform
cDNA vaccines (eg. AstraZenica) increased overall risk of cancer by 47% (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.39-1.56).
mRNA vaccines (eg. Pfizer/Moderna) increased overall risk of cancer by 20% (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.26).
Mixed schedules increased overall risk of cancer by 34% (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21-1.48).
Booster Dose Risk
Booster doses increased the risk of stomach cancer by 23% (HR 1.23, p=0.041).
Booster doses increased the risk of pancreatic cancer by 125% (HR 2.25, p<0.001).
Overall Trends
All demographic groups, including young adults, had a higher incidence of cancer. The mean age of individuals in this study was 44yo.
Men had a higher risk for stomach and lung cancers.
Women had a higher risk for thyroid and colorectal cancers.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41013858
https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w
Millions of people today are suffering from Long COVID and COVID Shot Injury. Unfortunately, many hospital affiliated physicians are ignorant of the underlying causes or in complete denial that COVID Shots have any side effects at all. Thus, they are at a loss as to how to truly help their patients. The key to treating Long COVID and COVID Shot Injury is to understand the underlying problem in both – the spike protein.
Spike protein is the part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that attaches to and infects human cells. It is incredibly toxic to the human body resulting in massive inflammation, broad scale antibody production, and microscopic clots, just to name a few of its effects. It’s the reason COVID was so deadly in its initial form. The mRNA shots that most people received codes for this spike protein. This genetic material spreads throughout all of our organ systems and turns our own cells into spike protein factories. Then our immune system comes into contact with the spike protein, makes antibodies to it, and that is what they hoped would save the day – that these anti-spike antibodies would prevent you from getting COVID, spreading COVID, and get us out of the pandemic. Well, as you can see in the data from my previous posts, it was a total disaster. Not only did they not prevent COVID, they made it more likely to get COVID. Further, they were incredibly dangerous with side effects including myocarditis, heart attack, stroke, turbo cancers, and blood clots.
The key to treating Long COVID and COVID Shot Injury is to mitigate the spike protein and its toxic effects. In my opinion, the two best treatment protocols for this immense problem are the protocols from Independent Medical Alliance developed by a team of physicians led by Paul Marik, MD and Pierre Kory, MD, and the McCullough Protocol developed by Peter McCullough, MD. I have had the honor to personally meet all three of these incredible physicians and have successfully used their protocols in treating thousands of patients over the past 4 years.
As the veil of censorship and ignorance is slowly lifted, it is my hope that all of our colleagues join us in fighting this pre-eminent problem of our time.